Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Mean BMI (kg/m²)
Bhutan
23.9
in 2016
Equatorial Guinea
24
in 2016
Bhutan rank
141st
Equatorial Guinea rank
138th
Mean BMI (kg/m²) over time
- Bhutan
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 24 against 23.9 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.1.
Across all 42 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 141st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 138th of 189 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 19.26 | 20.2 | 0.94 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1980s | 20.22 | 20.88 | 0.66 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1990s | 21.48 | 22.03 | 0.55 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 22.71 | 23.04 | 0.33 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 23.6 | 23.77 | 0.1714 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean bmi (kg/m²), Bhutan or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 24 against 23.9 in Bhutan as of 2016.
- What is the difference in mean bmi (kg/m²) between Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.1, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2016.
- How do Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for mean bmi (kg/m²)?
- Bhutan ranks 141st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 138th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean BMI (kg/m²) (age-standardized estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.