Costa Rica vs Grenada: Maternal mortality, gaps filled
Costa Rica
22
in 2020
Grenada
21.14
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
120th
Grenada rank
123rd
Maternal mortality, gaps filled over time
- Costa Rica
- Grenada
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 22 against 21.14 in Grenada, a difference of 0.86.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Grenada ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 120th and Grenada ranks 123rd of 189 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Grenada in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 46.52 | 52.39 | 5.86 | Grenada |
| 1990s | 42.15 | 49.53 | 7.38 | Grenada |
| 2000s | 32.26 | 34.08 | 1.83 | Grenada |
| 2010s | 21.62 | 24.18 | 2.56 | Grenada |
| 2020s | 22 | 21.14 | 0.8655 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher maternal mortality, gaps filled, Costa Rica or Grenada?
- Costa Rica, at 22 against 21.14 in Grenada as of 2020.
- What is the difference in maternal mortality, gaps filled between Costa Rica and Grenada?
- 0.86, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Grenada?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Grenada rank globally for maternal mortality, gaps filled?
- Costa Rica ranks 120th and Grenada ranks 123rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Maternal mortality, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Maternal mortality with 85 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.