Botswana vs East Timor: Maternal mortality, gaps filled
Botswana
185.9
in 2020
East Timor
203.92
in 2020
Botswana rank
49th
East Timor rank
47th
Maternal mortality, gaps filled over time
- Botswana
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 203.92 against 185.9 in Botswana, a difference of 18.02.
That makes East Timor's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 49th and East Timor ranks 47th of 189 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 227.29 | 1,521 | 1,294 | East Timor |
| 1990s | 197.59 | 1,129 | 931.07 | East Timor |
| 2000s | 195.74 | 592.82 | 397.08 | East Timor |
| 2010s | 166.84 | 292.59 | 125.75 | East Timor |
| 2020s | 185.9 | 203.92 | 18.03 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher maternal mortality, gaps filled, Botswana or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 203.92 against 185.9 in Botswana as of 2020.
- What is the difference in maternal mortality, gaps filled between Botswana and East Timor?
- 18.02, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and East Timor?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2020.
- How do Botswana and East Timor rank globally for maternal mortality, gaps filled?
- Botswana ranks 49th and East Timor ranks 47th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Maternal mortality, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Maternal mortality with 85 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.