South Sudan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under

South Sudan
56.9%
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of
57.4%
in 2024
South Sudan rank
15th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
14th

Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under over time

  • South Sudan
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0204060200020122024

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 57.4% against 56.9% in South Sudan, a difference of 0.5%.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

South Sudan ranks 15th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 14th of 40 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 9.6% 10.8% 1.2% Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 30.6% 47.3% 16.7% Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 56.8% 55.1% 1.7% South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under, South Sudan or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 57.4% against 56.9% in South Sudan as of 2024.
What is the difference in malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under between South Sudan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.5%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do South Sudan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under?
South Sudan ranks 15th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 14th of 40 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under an insecticide-treated bed net (ITN) the previous night (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under. Statizoid, drawing on World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/malaria-itn-use-population-in-malaria-endemic-areas-who-slept-under-an-insecticide/south-sudan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/malaria-itn-use-population-in-malaria-endemic-areas-who-slept-under-an-insecticide/south-sudan/tanzania/">South Sudan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under an insecticide-treated bed net (ITN) the previous night (%)
Source
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO)
Coverage
40 places, 1,000 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed