South Sudan vs Sudan: Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under
South Sudan
56.9%
in 2024
Sudan
56.6%
in 2024
South Sudan rank
15th
Sudan rank
16th
Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under over time
- South Sudan
- Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 56.9% against 56.6% in Sudan, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 15th and Sudan ranks 16th of 40 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.6% | 6.7% | 2.9% | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 30.6% | 45.2% | 14.5% | Sudan |
| 2020s | 56.8% | 62.8% | 6.0% | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under, South Sudan or Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 56.9% against 56.6% in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under between South Sudan and Sudan?
- 0.3%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Sudan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do South Sudan and Sudan rank globally for malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under?
- South Sudan ranks 15th and Sudan ranks 16th of 40 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under an insecticide-treated bed net (ITN) the previous night (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.