Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under
Rwanda
44.6%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
47.1%
in 2024
Rwanda rank
24th
Zimbabwe rank
22nd
Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under over time
- Rwanda
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 47.1% against 44.6% in Rwanda, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 24th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 40 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.3% | 5.0% | 8.3% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 52.5% | 30.9% | 21.6% | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 55.5% | 45.5% | 9.9% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under, Rwanda or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 47.1% against 44.6% in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under between Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
- 2.5%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Zimbabwe rank globally for malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under?
- Rwanda ranks 24th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 40 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under an insecticide-treated bed net (ITN) the previous night (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.