Mozambique vs Zimbabwe: Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under
Mozambique
51.3%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
47.1%
in 2024
Mozambique rank
20th
Zimbabwe rank
22nd
Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under over time
- Mozambique
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 51.3% against 47.1% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 4.2%.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 20th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 40 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.4% | 5.0% | 2.4% | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 41.8% | 30.9% | 10.9% | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 52.9% | 45.5% | 7.3% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under, Mozambique or Zimbabwe?
- Mozambique, at 51.3% against 47.1% in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under between Mozambique and Zimbabwe?
- 4.2%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Zimbabwe?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Mozambique and Zimbabwe rank globally for malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under?
- Mozambique ranks 20th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 40 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under an insecticide-treated bed net (ITN) the previous night (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.