Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under
Guinea
46.2%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
47.1%
in 2024
Guinea rank
23rd
Zimbabwe rank
22nd
Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under over time
- Guinea
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 47.1% against 46.2% in Guinea, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Guinea ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 40 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.8% | 5.0% | 1.3% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 35.4% | 30.9% | 4.5% | Guinea |
| 2020s | 57.2% | 45.5% | 11.6% | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under, Guinea or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 47.1% against 46.2% in Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under between Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 0.9%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under?
- Guinea ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 40 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under an insecticide-treated bed net (ITN) the previous night (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.