Guinea vs Rwanda: Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under
Guinea
46.2%
in 2024
Rwanda
44.6%
in 2024
Guinea rank
23rd
Rwanda rank
24th
Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under over time
- Guinea
- Rwanda
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 46.2% against 44.6% in Rwanda, a difference of 1.6%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.
Guinea ranks 23rd and Rwanda ranks 24th of 40 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.8% | 13.3% | 9.5% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 35.4% | 52.5% | 17.1% | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 57.2% | 55.5% | 1.7% | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under, Guinea or Rwanda?
- Guinea, at 46.2% against 44.6% in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under between Guinea and Rwanda?
- 1.6%, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Rwanda?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Guinea and Rwanda rank globally for malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under?
- Guinea ranks 23rd and Rwanda ranks 24th of 40 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under an insecticide-treated bed net (ITN) the previous night (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.