Chad vs Zimbabwe: Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under
Chad
50.1%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
47.1%
in 2024
Chad rank
21st
Zimbabwe rank
22nd
Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under over time
- Chad
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Chad currently reports 50.1% against 47.1% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.0%.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Chad ranks 21st and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 40 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.8% | 5.0% | 1.2% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 27.8% | 30.9% | 3.1% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 44.5% | 45.5% | 1.0% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under, Chad or Zimbabwe?
- Chad, at 50.1% against 47.1% in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under between Chad and Zimbabwe?
- 3.0%, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Zimbabwe?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Chad and Zimbabwe rank globally for malaria itn use: population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under?
- Chad ranks 21st and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 40 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Malaria ITN use: Population in malaria-endemic areas who slept under an insecticide-treated bed net (ITN) the previous night (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.