IBRD only vs Jordan: Low-birthweight babies
IBRD only
15.8%
in 2020
Jordan
18.9%
in 2020
IBRD only rank
6th
Jordan rank
9th
Low-birthweight babies over time
- IBRD only
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 18.9% against 15.8% in IBRD only, a difference of 3.1%.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.2 times IBRD only's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was IBRD only ahead.
IBRD only ranks 6th and Jordan ranks 9th of 31 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, IBRD only averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.6% | 15.5% | 2.1% | IBRD only |
| 2010s | 15.7% | 17.5% | 1.8% | Jordan |
| 2020s | 15.8% | 18.9% | 3.1% | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher low-birthweight babies, IBRD only or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 18.9% against 15.8% in IBRD only as of 2020.
- What is the difference in low-birthweight babies between IBRD only and Jordan?
- 3.1%, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Jordan?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do IBRD only and Jordan rank globally for low-birthweight babies?
- IBRD only ranks 6th and Jordan ranks 9th of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF-WHO Low birthweight estimates, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), published as Low-birthweight babies (% of births). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Low-birthweight babies are newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams, with the measurement taken within the first hour of life, before significant postnatal weight loss has occurred.