East Asia & Pacific vs Suriname: Low-birthweight babies
East Asia & Pacific
8.5%
in 2020
Suriname
16.5%
in 2020
East Asia & Pacific rank
19th
Suriname rank
22nd
Low-birthweight babies over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 16.5% against 8.5% in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 8.0%.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.9 times East Asia & Pacific's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 19th and Suriname ranks 22nd of 31 groups.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.7% | 14.7% | 6.0% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 8.2% | 15.9% | 7.7% | Suriname |
| 2020s | 8.5% | 16.5% | 8.0% | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher low-birthweight babies, East Asia & Pacific or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 16.5% against 8.5% in East Asia & Pacific as of 2020.
- What is the difference in low-birthweight babies between East Asia & Pacific and Suriname?
- 8.0%, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Suriname?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and Suriname rank globally for low-birthweight babies?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 19th and Suriname ranks 22nd of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF-WHO Low birthweight estimates, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), published as Low-birthweight babies (% of births). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Low-birthweight babies are newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams, with the measurement taken within the first hour of life, before significant postnatal weight loss has occurred.