Cuba vs Malta: Low-birthweight babies
Cuba
7.1%
in 2020
Malta
7.2%
in 2020
Cuba rank
119th
Malta rank
118th
Low-birthweight babies over time
- Cuba
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 7.2% against 7.1% in Cuba, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 119th and Malta ranks 118th of 157 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.1% | 6.7% | 0.4% | Cuba |
| 2010s | 7.2% | 7.0% | 0.1% | Cuba |
| 2020s | 7.1% | 7.2% | 0.1% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher low-birthweight babies, Cuba or Malta?
- Malta, at 7.2% against 7.1% in Cuba as of 2020.
- What is the difference in low-birthweight babies between Cuba and Malta?
- 0.1%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Malta?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Cuba and Malta rank globally for low-birthweight babies?
- Cuba ranks 119th and Malta ranks 118th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF-WHO Low birthweight estimates, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), published as Low-birthweight babies (% of births). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Low-birthweight babies are newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams, with the measurement taken within the first hour of life, before significant postnatal weight loss has occurred.