9 vs Namibia: Low birth weight prevalence

9
11.8%
in 2020
Namibia
15.6%
in 2020
9 rank
29th
Namibia rank
26th

Low birth weight prevalence over time

  • 9
  • Namibia
051015200020102020

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 15.6% against 11.8% in 9, a difference of 3.8%.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times 9's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

9 ranks 29th and Namibia ranks 26th of 50 groups.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade 9 Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 11.0% 16.3% 5.3% Namibia
2010s 11.5% 15.8% 4.3% Namibia
2020s 11.8% 15.6% 3.8% Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher low birth weight prevalence, 9 or Namibia?
Namibia, at 15.6% against 11.8% in 9 as of 2020.
What is the difference in low birth weight prevalence between 9 and Namibia?
3.8%, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for 9 and Namibia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do 9 and Namibia rank globally for low birth weight prevalence?
9 ranks 29th and Namibia ranks 26th of 50 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Low birth weight prevalence (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Low birth weight prevalence (%)
Source
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO)
Coverage
208 places, 4,368 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed