39 vs Lesotho: Low birth weight prevalence

39
8.2%
in 2020
Lesotho
14.4%
in 2020
39 rank
38th
Lesotho rank
36th

Low birth weight prevalence over time

  • 39
  • Lesotho
051015200020102020

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 14.4% against 8.2% in 39, a difference of 6.2%.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.8 times 39's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.

39 ranks 38th and Lesotho ranks 36th of 50 groups.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade 39 Lesotho Difference Ahead
2000s 7.6% 14.9% 7.3% Lesotho
2010s 8.1% 14.7% 6.6% Lesotho
2020s 8.2% 14.4% 6.2% Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher low birth weight prevalence, 39 or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 14.4% against 8.2% in 39 as of 2020.
What is the difference in low birth weight prevalence between 39 and Lesotho?
6.2%, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for 39 and Lesotho?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do 39 and Lesotho rank globally for low birth weight prevalence?
39 ranks 38th and Lesotho ranks 36th of 50 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Low birth weight prevalence (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Low birth weight prevalence (%)
Source
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO)
Coverage
208 places, 4,368 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed