145 vs Namibia: Low birth weight prevalence
145
12.2%
in 2020
Namibia
15.6%
in 2020
145 rank
27th
Namibia rank
26th
Low birth weight prevalence over time
- 145
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 15.6% against 12.2% in 145, a difference of 3.4%.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times 145's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
145 ranks 27th and Namibia ranks 26th of 50 groups.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | 145 | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.3% | 16.3% | 4.0% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 12.2% | 15.8% | 3.6% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 12.2% | 15.6% | 3.4% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher low birth weight prevalence, 145 or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 15.6% against 12.2% in 145 as of 2020.
- What is the difference in low birth weight prevalence between 145 and Namibia?
- 3.4%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for 145 and Namibia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do 145 and Namibia rank globally for low birth weight prevalence?
- 145 ranks 27th and Namibia ranks 26th of 50 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Low birth weight prevalence (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.