Australia vs Congo: Low birth weight number
Australia
19.4
in 2020
Congo
21.2
in 2020
Australia rank
68th
Congo rank
65th
Low birth weight number over time
- Australia
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 21.2 against 19.4 in Australia, a difference of 1.8.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 68th and Congo ranks 65th of 157 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.75 | 16.98 | 0.23 | Congo |
| 2010s | 19.77 | 20.51 | 0.74 | Congo |
| 2020s | 19.4 | 21.2 | 1.8 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher low birth weight number, Australia or Congo?
- Congo, at 21.2 against 19.4 in Australia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in low birth weight number between Australia and Congo?
- 1.8, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Congo rank globally for low birth weight number?
- Australia ranks 68th and Congo ranks 65th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Low birth weight number (in thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.