722 vs Zimbabwe: Low birth weight number
722
172.9
in 2020
Zimbabwe
57.5
in 2020
722 rank
39th
Zimbabwe rank
37th
Low birth weight number over time
- 722
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
722 currently reports 172.9 against 57.5 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 115.4.
That makes 722's figure about 3.0 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, 722 has been ahead every year.
722 ranks 39th and Zimbabwe ranks 37th of 50 groups.
722 has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | 722 | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 163.54 | 55.84 | 107.7 | 722 |
| 2010s | 173.34 | 58.66 | 114.68 | 722 |
| 2020s | 172.9 | 57.5 | 115.4 | 722 |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher low birth weight number, 722 or Zimbabwe?
- 722, at 172.9 against 57.5 in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in low birth weight number between 722 and Zimbabwe?
- 115.4, with 722 ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for 722 and Zimbabwe?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do 722 and Zimbabwe rank globally for low birth weight number?
- 722 ranks 39th and Zimbabwe ranks 37th of 50 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Low birth weight number (in thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.