17 vs Malawi: Low birth weight number
17
908.5
in 2020
Malawi
100.3
in 2020
17 rank
26th
Malawi rank
25th
Low birth weight number over time
- 17
- Malawi
How they compare
17 currently reports 908.5 against 100.3 in Malawi, a difference of 808.2.
That makes 17's figure about 9.1 times Malawi's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, 17 has been ahead every year.
17 ranks 26th and Malawi ranks 25th of 50 groups.
17 has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | 17 | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 676.34 | 90.7 | 585.64 | 17 |
| 2010s | 826.69 | 96.39 | 730.3 | 17 |
| 2020s | 908.5 | 100.3 | 808.2 | 17 |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher low birth weight number, 17 or Malawi?
- 17, at 908.5 against 100.3 in Malawi as of 2020.
- What is the difference in low birth weight number between 17 and Malawi?
- 808.2, with 17 ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for 17 and Malawi?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do 17 and Malawi rank globally for low birth weight number?
- 17 ranks 26th and Malawi ranks 25th of 50 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Low birth weight number (in thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.