155 vs Zimbabwe: Low birth weight number
155
130.6
in 2020
Zimbabwe
57.5
in 2020
155 rank
40th
Zimbabwe rank
37th
Low birth weight number over time
- 155
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
155 currently reports 130.6 against 57.5 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 73.1.
That makes 155's figure about 2.3 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, 155 has been ahead every year.
155 ranks 40th and Zimbabwe ranks 37th of 50 groups.
155 has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | 155 | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 136.53 | 55.84 | 80.69 | 155 |
| 2010s | 136.36 | 58.66 | 77.7 | 155 |
| 2020s | 130.6 | 57.5 | 73.1 | 155 |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher low birth weight number, 155 or Zimbabwe?
- 155, at 130.6 against 57.5 in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in low birth weight number between 155 and Zimbabwe?
- 73.1, with 155 ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for 155 and Zimbabwe?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do 155 and Zimbabwe rank globally for low birth weight number?
- 155 ranks 40th and Zimbabwe ranks 37th of 50 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Low birth weight number (in thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.