13 vs Zimbabwe: Low birth weight number
13
321.2
in 2020
Zimbabwe
57.5
in 2020
13 rank
36th
Zimbabwe rank
37th
Low birth weight number over time
- 13
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
13 currently reports 321.2 against 57.5 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 263.7.
That makes 13's figure about 5.6 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, 13 has been ahead every year.
13 ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 37th of 50 groups.
13 has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | 13 | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 361.67 | 55.84 | 305.83 | 13 |
| 2010s | 347.92 | 58.66 | 289.26 | 13 |
| 2020s | 321.2 | 57.5 | 263.7 | 13 |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher low birth weight number, 13 or Zimbabwe?
- 13, at 321.2 against 57.5 in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in low birth weight number between 13 and Zimbabwe?
- 263.7, with 13 ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for 13 and Zimbabwe?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do 13 and Zimbabwe rank globally for low birth weight number?
- 13 ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 37th of 50 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Low birth weight number (in thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.