(SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) vs Chinese Taipei: Live Births Surviving to Age 1
(SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs)
4,726
in 2100
Chinese Taipei
57.99
in 2100
(SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) rank
120th
Chinese Taipei rank
122nd
Live Births Surviving to Age 1 over time
- (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs)
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
(SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) currently reports 4,726 against 57.99 in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 4,668.
That makes (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs)'s figure about 81.5 times Chinese Taipei's.
Across all 151 years both countries report, (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) has been ahead every year.
(SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) ranks 120th and Chinese Taipei ranks 122nd of 188 groups.
(SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 810.7 | 380.07 | 430.63 | (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) |
| 1960s | 1,099 | 407.4 | 691.19 | (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) |
| 1970s | 1,498 | 389.54 | 1,108 | (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) |
| 1980s | 2,095 | 369.56 | 1,725 | (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) |
| 1990s | 2,511 | 320.45 | 2,191 | (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) |
| 2000s | 3,039 | 221.93 | 2,818 | (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) |
| 2010s | 3,527 | 197.23 | 3,329 | (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) |
| 2020s | 4,299 | 131.56 | 4,167 | (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) |
| 2030s | 4,676 | 110.79 | 4,565 | (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) |
| 2040s | 4,897 | 105.22 | 4,792 | (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) |
| 2050s | 5,166 | 96.55 | 5,069 | (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) |
| 2060s | 5,203 | 77.73 | 5,125 | (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) |
| 2070s | 5,120 | 73.1 | 5,047 | (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) |
| 2080s | 5,040 | 71.12 | 4,968 | (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) |
| 2090s | 4,855 | 63.25 | 4,792 | (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) |
| 2100s | 4,726 | 57.99 | 4,668 | (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher live births surviving to age 1, (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) or Chinese Taipei?
- (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs), at 4,726 against 57.99 in Chinese Taipei as of 2100.
- What is the difference in live births surviving to age 1 between (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) and Chinese Taipei?
- 4,668, with (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) and Chinese Taipei?
- 151 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2100.
- How do (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) and Chinese Taipei rank globally for live births surviving to age 1?
- (SDGRC) ESCWA_Arab Low-Income Countries (LICs) ranks 120th and Chinese Taipei ranks 122nd of 188 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Live Births Surviving to Age 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.