ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) vs New Caledonia: Live Births Surviving to Age 1
ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE)
289.5
in 2100
New Caledonia
3.04
in 2100
ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) rank
179th
New Caledonia rank
180th
Live Births Surviving to Age 1 over time
- ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE)
- New Caledonia
How they compare
ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) currently reports 289.5 against 3.04 in New Caledonia, a difference of 286.46.
That makes ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE)'s figure about 95.4 times New Caledonia's.
Across all 151 years both countries report, ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) has been ahead every year.
ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) ranks 179th and New Caledonia ranks 180th of 188 groups.
ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 114.3 | 2.31 | 111.99 | ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) |
| 1960s | 144.11 | 3.12 | 140.99 | ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) |
| 1970s | 167.36 | 4.02 | 163.35 | ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) |
| 1980s | 193.73 | 3.96 | 189.77 | ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) |
| 1990s | 230.02 | 4.47 | 225.55 | ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) |
| 2000s | 279.25 | 4.42 | 274.83 | ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) |
| 2010s | 314.94 | 4.39 | 310.55 | ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) |
| 2020s | 323.47 | 4.06 | 319.41 | ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) |
| 2030s | 332.21 | 3.91 | 328.3 | ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) |
| 2040s | 339.75 | 3.83 | 335.92 | ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) |
| 2050s | 336.57 | 3.67 | 332.9 | ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) |
| 2060s | 330.31 | 3.52 | 326.8 | ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) |
| 2070s | 322.52 | 3.4 | 319.12 | ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) |
| 2080s | 311.58 | 3.27 | 308.31 | ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) |
| 2090s | 297.93 | 3.12 | 294.81 | ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) |
| 2100s | 289.5 | 3.04 | 286.46 | ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher live births surviving to age 1, ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) or New Caledonia?
- ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE), at 289.5 against 3.04 in New Caledonia as of 2100.
- What is the difference in live births surviving to age 1 between ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) and New Caledonia?
- 286.46, with ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) and New Caledonia?
- 151 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2100.
- How do ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) and New Caledonia rank globally for live births surviving to age 1?
- ESCAP_Pacific island developing economies (PIDE) ranks 179th and New Caledonia ranks 180th of 188 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Live Births Surviving to Age 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.