ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) vs Serbia: Live Births Surviving to Age 1
ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)
3,135
in 2100
Serbia
27.68
in 2100
ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) rank
136th
Serbia rank
137th
Live Births Surviving to Age 1 over time
- ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)
- Serbia
How they compare
ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) currently reports 3,135 against 27.68 in Serbia, a difference of 3,107.
That makes ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)'s figure about 113.3 times Serbia's.
Across all 151 years both countries report, ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) has been ahead every year.
ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) ranks 136th and Serbia ranks 137th of 188 groups.
ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 4,821 | 132.34 | 4,689 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 1960s | 4,452 | 111.01 | 4,341 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 1970s | 4,439 | 113.4 | 4,326 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 1980s | 5,189 | 103.02 | 5,086 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 1990s | 3,818 | 79.04 | 3,739 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2000s | 3,583 | 69.67 | 3,513 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2010s | 4,341 | 67.67 | 4,273 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2020s | 3,679 | 58.53 | 3,620 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2030s | 3,593 | 51.84 | 3,542 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2040s | 3,921 | 48.1 | 3,873 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2050s | 3,638 | 43.56 | 3,595 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2060s | 3,470 | 38.63 | 3,432 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2070s | 3,525 | 35.56 | 3,489 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2080s | 3,358 | 32.54 | 3,326 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2090s | 3,167 | 29.22 | 3,137 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2100s | 3,135 | 27.68 | 3,108 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher live births surviving to age 1, ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) or Serbia?
- ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS), at 3,135 against 27.68 in Serbia as of 2100.
- What is the difference in live births surviving to age 1 between ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) and Serbia?
- 3,107, with ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) and Serbia?
- 151 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2100.
- How do ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) and Serbia rank globally for live births surviving to age 1?
- ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) ranks 136th and Serbia ranks 137th of 188 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Live Births Surviving to Age 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.