Cuba vs ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA): Live Births Surviving to Age 1

Cuba
38.36
in 2100
ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)
3,997
in 2100
Cuba rank
131st
ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA) rank
130th

Live Births Surviving to Age 1 over time

  • Cuba
  • ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)
010.0k20.0k30.0k195020252100

How they compare

ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA) currently reports 3,997 against 38.36 in Cuba, a difference of 3,959.

That makes ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)'s figure about 104.2 times Cuba's.

Across all 151 years both countries report, ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA) has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 131st and ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA) ranks 130th of 235 countries.

ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA) has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA) Difference Ahead
1950s 192.25 25,255 25,062 ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)
1960s 254.18 28,918 28,664 ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)
1970s 202.4 27,101 26,899 ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)
1980s 163.94 26,255 26,091 ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)
1990s 155.13 21,858 21,703 ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)
2000s 127.46 18,721 18,593 ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)
2010s 120.82 19,345 19,224 ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)
2020s 94.1 10,632 10,538 ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)
2030s 84.39 9,794 9,710 ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)
2040s 73.16 9,755 9,682 ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)
2050s 63.34 7,277 7,213 ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)
2060s 56.69 6,035 5,979 ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)
2070s 50.72 5,955 5,904 ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)
2080s 44.92 4,971 4,926 ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)
2090s 40.47 4,115 4,074 ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)
2100s 38.36 3,997 3,958 ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher live births surviving to age 1, Cuba or ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)?
ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA), at 3,997 against 38.36 in Cuba as of 2100.
What is the difference in live births surviving to age 1 between Cuba and ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)?
3,959, with ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)?
151 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2100.
How do Cuba and ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA) rank globally for live births surviving to age 1?
Cuba ranks 131st and ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA) ranks 130th of 235 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Live Births Surviving to Age 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA): Live Births Surviving to Age 1. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/live-births-surviving-to-age-1/cuba/escap-east-and-north-east-asia-enea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/live-births-surviving-to-age-1/cuba/escap-east-and-north-east-asia-enea/">Cuba vs ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA): Live Births Surviving to Age 1</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Live Births Surviving to Age 1
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
424 places, 64,024 data points, 1950–2100
Last refreshed