Belarus vs ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS): Live Births Surviving to Age 1
Belarus
29.05
in 2100
ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)
3,135
in 2100
Belarus rank
135th
ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) rank
136th
Live Births Surviving to Age 1 over time
- Belarus
- ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)
How they compare
ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) currently reports 3,135 against 29.05 in Belarus, a difference of 3,106.
That makes ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)'s figure about 107.9 times Belarus's.
Across all 151 years both countries report, ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 135th and ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) ranks 136th of 235 countries.
ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 174.2 | 4,821 | 4,647 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 1960s | 164.32 | 4,452 | 4,288 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 1970s | 143.76 | 4,439 | 4,295 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 1980s | 158.8 | 5,189 | 5,030 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 1990s | 106.08 | 3,818 | 3,712 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2000s | 92.83 | 3,583 | 3,490 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2010s | 108.72 | 4,341 | 4,232 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2020s | 66.67 | 3,679 | 3,612 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2030s | 60.56 | 3,593 | 3,533 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2040s | 64.45 | 3,921 | 3,856 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2050s | 49.42 | 3,638 | 3,589 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2060s | 41.13 | 3,470 | 3,429 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2070s | 42.15 | 3,525 | 3,483 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2080s | 35.73 | 3,358 | 3,323 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2090s | 29.57 | 3,167 | 3,137 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
| 2100s | 29.05 | 3,135 | 3,106 | ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher live births surviving to age 1, Belarus or ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)?
- ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS), at 3,135 against 29.05 in Belarus as of 2100.
- What is the difference in live births surviving to age 1 between Belarus and ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)?
- 3,106, with ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS)?
- 151 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2100.
- How do Belarus and ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) rank globally for live births surviving to age 1?
- Belarus ranks 135th and ECE_Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (CIS) ranks 136th of 235 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Live Births Surviving to Age 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.