Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) vs Hong Kong: Live Births Surviving to Age 1

Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
458.2
in 2100
Hong Kong
5.67
in 2100
Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) rank
173rd
Hong Kong rank
171st

Live Births Surviving to Age 1 over time

  • Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
  • Hong Kong
0100200300400500195020252100

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) currently reports 458.2 against 5.67 in Hong Kong, a difference of 452.53.

That makes Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)'s figure about 80.9 times Hong Kong's.

Across all 151 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) ranks 173rd and Hong Kong ranks 171st of 188 groups.

Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1950s 255.45 89.81 165.64 Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
1960s 288.95 97.94 191.01 Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
1970s 299.57 77.98 221.59 Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
1980s 291.65 80.18 211.47 Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
1990s 312.89 72.25 240.65 Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
2000s 324.95 59.73 265.22 Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
2010s 364.41 74.59 289.82 Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
2020s 359.56 41.01 318.55 Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
2030s 357.47 26.91 330.56 Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
2040s 380.35 22.8 357.55 Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
2050s 390.84 17.66 373.18 Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
2060s 399.81 12.39 387.42 Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
2070s 419.2 9.97 409.23 Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
2080s 437.02 8.67 428.36 Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
2090s 451.21 6.65 444.56 Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
2100s 458.2 5.67 452.53 Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher live births surviving to age 1, Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) or Hong Kong?
Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG), at 458.2 against 5.67 in Hong Kong as of 2100.
What is the difference in live births surviving to age 1 between Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) and Hong Kong?
452.53, with Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) and Hong Kong?
151 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2100.
How do Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) and Hong Kong rank globally for live births surviving to age 1?
Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) ranks 173rd and Hong Kong ranks 171st of 188 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Live Births Surviving to Age 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) vs Hong Kong: Live Births Surviving to Age 1. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/live-births-surviving-to-age-1/australia-and-new-zealand-unsdg/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/live-births-surviving-to-age-1/australia-and-new-zealand-unsdg/hong-kong-sar-china/">Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) vs Hong Kong: Live Births Surviving to Age 1</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Live Births Surviving to Age 1
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
424 places, 64,024 data points, 1950–2100
Last refreshed