Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Laboratories providing tuberculosis diagnostic services using sputum
Papua New Guinea
1.5
in 2014
Zimbabwe
1.4
in 2014
Papua New Guinea rank
57th
Zimbabwe rank
60th
Laboratories providing tuberculosis diagnostic services using sputum over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 1.5 against 1.4 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 57th and Zimbabwe ranks 60th of 156 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.32 | 1.16 | 0.16 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 1.66 | 1.2 | 0.46 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher laboratories providing tuberculosis diagnostic services using sputum, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
- Papua New Guinea, at 1.5 against 1.4 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in laboratories providing tuberculosis diagnostic services using sputum between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for laboratories providing tuberculosis diagnostic services using sputum?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 57th and Zimbabwe ranks 60th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Laboratories providing tuberculosis diagnostic services using sputum smear microscopy (per 100 000 population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.