Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwe: Laboratories providing tuberculosis diagnostic services using culture
Sri Lanka
0.7
in 2014
Zimbabwe
0.7
in 2014
Sri Lanka rank
111th
Zimbabwe rank
111th
Laboratories providing tuberculosis diagnostic services using culture over time
- Sri Lanka
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0.7 against 0.7 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 111th of 157 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.04 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.62 | 0.7 | 0.08 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher laboratories providing tuberculosis diagnostic services using culture, Sri Lanka or Zimbabwe?
- Sri Lanka, at 0.7 against 0.7 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in laboratories providing tuberculosis diagnostic services using culture between Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe rank globally for laboratories providing tuberculosis diagnostic services using culture?
- Sri Lanka ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 111th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Laboratories providing tuberculosis diagnostic services using culture (per 5 million population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.