Eastern Asia vs Polynesia: International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR
Eastern Asia
82.0%
in 2024
Polynesia
59.0%
in 2024
Eastern Asia rank
3rd
Polynesia rank
2nd
International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR over time
- Eastern Asia
- Polynesia
How they compare
Eastern Asia currently reports 82.0% against 59.0% in Polynesia, a difference of 23.0%.
That makes Eastern Asia's figure about 1.4 times Polynesia's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Eastern Asia has been ahead every year.
Eastern Asia ranks 3rd and Polynesia ranks 2nd of 36 groups.
Eastern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 85.2% | 63.9% | 21.3% | Eastern Asia |
| 2020s | 86.0% | 59.0% | 27.0% | Eastern Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher international health regulations (ihr) capacity, by type of ihr, Eastern Asia or Polynesia?
- Eastern Asia, at 82.0% against 59.0% in Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in international health regulations (ihr) capacity, by type of ihr between Eastern Asia and Polynesia?
- 23.0%, with Eastern Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and Polynesia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Eastern Asia and Polynesia rank globally for international health regulations (ihr) capacity, by type of ihr?
- Eastern Asia ranks 3rd and Polynesia ranks 2nd of 36 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR capacity (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.