Eastern Asia vs Micronesia: International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR
Eastern Asia
82.0%
in 2024
Micronesia
49.0%
in 2024
Eastern Asia rank
3rd
Micronesia rank
4th
International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR over time
- Eastern Asia
- Micronesia
How they compare
Eastern Asia currently reports 82.0% against 49.0% in Micronesia, a difference of 33.0%.
That makes Eastern Asia's figure about 1.7 times Micronesia's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Eastern Asia has been ahead every year.
Eastern Asia ranks 3rd and Micronesia ranks 4th of 36 groups.
Eastern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia | Micronesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 85.2% | 63.0% | 22.2% | Eastern Asia |
| 2020s | 86.0% | 51.8% | 34.2% | Eastern Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher international health regulations (ihr) capacity, by type of ihr, Eastern Asia or Micronesia?
- Eastern Asia, at 82.0% against 49.0% in Micronesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in international health regulations (ihr) capacity, by type of ihr between Eastern Asia and Micronesia?
- 33.0%, with Eastern Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and Micronesia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Eastern Asia and Micronesia rank globally for international health regulations (ihr) capacity, by type of ihr?
- Eastern Asia ranks 3rd and Micronesia ranks 4th of 36 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR capacity (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.