Eastern Asia vs Melanesia: International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR
Eastern Asia
82.0%
in 2024
Melanesia
50.0%
in 2024
Eastern Asia rank
3rd
Melanesia rank
3rd
International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR over time
- Eastern Asia
- Melanesia
How they compare
Eastern Asia currently reports 82.0% against 50.0% in Melanesia, a difference of 32.0%.
That makes Eastern Asia's figure about 1.6 times Melanesia's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Eastern Asia has been ahead every year.
Eastern Asia ranks 3rd and Melanesia ranks 3rd of 36 groups.
Eastern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 84.7% | 44.3% | 40.3% | Eastern Asia |
| 2020s | 86.0% | 52.6% | 33.4% | Eastern Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher international health regulations (ihr) capacity, by type of ihr, Eastern Asia or Melanesia?
- Eastern Asia, at 82.0% against 50.0% in Melanesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in international health regulations (ihr) capacity, by type of ihr between Eastern Asia and Melanesia?
- 32.0%, with Eastern Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and Melanesia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Eastern Asia and Melanesia rank globally for international health regulations (ihr) capacity, by type of ihr?
- Eastern Asia ranks 3rd and Melanesia ranks 3rd of 36 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR capacity (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.