Eastern and South-Eastern Asia vs Micronesia: International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR

Eastern and South-Eastern Asia
74.0%
in 2024
Micronesia
49.0%
in 2024
Eastern and South-Eastern Asia rank
8th
Micronesia rank
5th

International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR over time

  • Eastern and South-Eastern Asia
  • Micronesia
020406080201020172024

How they compare

Eastern and South-Eastern Asia currently reports 74.0% against 49.0% in Micronesia, a difference of 25.0%.

That makes Eastern and South-Eastern Asia's figure about 1.5 times Micronesia's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Eastern and South-Eastern Asia has been ahead every year.

Eastern and South-Eastern Asia ranks 8th and Micronesia ranks 5th of 35 groups.

Eastern and South-Eastern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern and South-Eastern Asia Micronesia Difference Ahead
2010s 78.4% 63.0% 15.4% Eastern and South-Eastern Asia
2020s 74.8% 51.8% 23.0% Eastern and South-Eastern Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher international health regulations (ihr) capacity, by type of ihr, Eastern and South-Eastern Asia or Micronesia?
Eastern and South-Eastern Asia, at 74.0% against 49.0% in Micronesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in international health regulations (ihr) capacity, by type of ihr between Eastern and South-Eastern Asia and Micronesia?
25.0%, with Eastern and South-Eastern Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern and South-Eastern Asia and Micronesia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Eastern and South-Eastern Asia and Micronesia rank globally for international health regulations (ihr) capacity, by type of ihr?
Eastern and South-Eastern Asia ranks 8th and Micronesia ranks 5th of 35 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR capacity (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern and South-Eastern Asia vs Micronesia: International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/international-health-regulations-ihr-capacity-by-type-of-ihr-capacity-percent/eastern-and-south-eastern-asia/micronesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/international-health-regulations-ihr-capacity-by-type-of-ihr-capacity-percent/eastern-and-south-eastern-asia/micronesia/">Eastern and South-Eastern Asia vs Micronesia: International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR capacity (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
40 places, 596 data points, 2010–2024
Last refreshed