Australia and New Zealand vs Melanesia: International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR

Australia and New Zealand
88.0%
in 2024
Melanesia
50.0%
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
1st
Melanesia rank
3rd

International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Melanesia
20406080100201020172024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 88.0% against 50.0% in Melanesia, a difference of 38.0%.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.8 times Melanesia's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 1st and Melanesia ranks 3rd of 4 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Melanesia Difference Ahead
2010s 94.8% 44.3% 50.4% Australia and New Zealand
2020s 87.6% 52.6% 35.0% Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher international health regulations (ihr) capacity, by type of ihr, Australia and New Zealand or Melanesia?
Australia and New Zealand, at 88.0% against 50.0% in Melanesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in international health regulations (ihr) capacity, by type of ihr between Australia and New Zealand and Melanesia?
38.0%, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Melanesia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Melanesia rank globally for international health regulations (ihr) capacity, by type of ihr?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 1st and Melanesia ranks 3rd of 4 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR capacity (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Melanesia: International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/international-health-regulations-ihr-capacity-by-type-of-ihr-capacity-percent/australia-and-new-zealand/melanesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/international-health-regulations-ihr-capacity-by-type-of-ihr-capacity-percent/australia-and-new-zealand/melanesia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Melanesia: International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR capacity (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
40 places, 596 data points, 2010–2024
Last refreshed