Australia and New Zealand vs Eastern Asia: International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR

Australia and New Zealand
88.0%
in 2024
Eastern Asia
82.0%
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
1st
Eastern Asia rank
3rd

International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Eastern Asia
020406080100201020172024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 88.0% against 82.0% in Eastern Asia, a difference of 6.0%.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Eastern Asia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 1st and Eastern Asia ranks 3rd of 4 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Eastern Asia Difference Ahead
2010s 95.1% 85.2% 9.9% Australia and New Zealand
2020s 87.6% 86.0% 1.6% Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher international health regulations (ihr) capacity, by type of ihr, Australia and New Zealand or Eastern Asia?
Australia and New Zealand, at 88.0% against 82.0% in Eastern Asia as of 2024.
What is the difference in international health regulations (ihr) capacity, by type of ihr between Australia and New Zealand and Eastern Asia?
6.0%, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Eastern Asia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Eastern Asia rank globally for international health regulations (ihr) capacity, by type of ihr?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 1st and Eastern Asia ranks 3rd of 4 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR capacity (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Eastern Asia: International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/international-health-regulations-ihr-capacity-by-type-of-ihr-capacity-percent/australia-and-new-zealand/eastern-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/international-health-regulations-ihr-capacity-by-type-of-ihr-capacity-percent/australia-and-new-zealand/eastern-asia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Eastern Asia: International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR capacity (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
40 places, 596 data points, 2010–2024
Last refreshed