New Zealand vs South-East Asia (WHO region): International Health Regulations core capacity scores, SPAR version
New Zealand
100
in 2025
South-East Asia (WHO region)
61
in 2025
New Zealand rank
1st
South-East Asia (WHO region) rank
3rd
International Health Regulations core capacity scores, SPAR version over time
- New Zealand
- South-East Asia (WHO region)
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 100 against 61 in South-East Asia (WHO region), a difference of 39.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.6 times South-East Asia (WHO region)'s.
Across all 5 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 1st and South-East Asia (WHO region) ranks 3rd of 175 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher international health regulations core capacity scores, spar version, New Zealand or South-East Asia (WHO region)?
- New Zealand, at 100 against 61 in South-East Asia (WHO region) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in international health regulations core capacity scores, spar version between New Zealand and South-East Asia (WHO region)?
- 39, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and South-East Asia (WHO region)?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2021 to 2025.
- How do New Zealand and South-East Asia (WHO region) rank globally for international health regulations core capacity scores, spar version?
- New Zealand ranks 1st and South-East Asia (WHO region) ranks 3rd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as International Health Regulations core capacity scores, SPAR version, 2nd edition. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.