Mus vs New Zealand: International Health Regulations core capacity scores, SPAR version
Mus
20
in 2025
New Zealand
100
in 2025
Mus rank
2nd
New Zealand rank
1st
International Health Regulations core capacity scores, SPAR version over time
- Mus
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 100 against 20 in Mus, a difference of 80.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 5.0 times Mus's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Mus ranks 2nd and New Zealand ranks 1st of 2 regions.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher international health regulations core capacity scores, spar version, Mus or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 100 against 20 in Mus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in international health regulations core capacity scores, spar version between Mus and New Zealand?
- 80, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mus and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2021 to 2025.
- How do Mus and New Zealand rank globally for international health regulations core capacity scores, spar version?
- Mus ranks 2nd and New Zealand ranks 1st of 2 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as International Health Regulations core capacity scores, SPAR version, 2nd edition. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.