World vs Zambia: Insufficiently active

World
81.03
in 2016
Zambia
89.27
in 2016
World rank
7th
Zambia rank
6th

Insufficiently active over time

  • World
  • Zambia
020406080200120082016

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 89.27 against 81.03 in World, a difference of 8.24.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times World's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

World ranks 7th and Zambia ranks 6th of 11 groups.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade World Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 82.17 88.68 6.51 Zambia
2010s 81.3 89.11 7.81 Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher insufficiently active, World or Zambia?
Zambia, at 89.27 against 81.03 in World as of 2016.
What is the difference in insufficiently active between World and Zambia?
8.24, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for World and Zambia?
16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
How do World and Zambia rank globally for insufficiently active?
World ranks 7th and Zambia ranks 6th of 11 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Insufficiently active (crude estimate)
Source
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO)
Coverage
144 places, 2,304 data points, 2001–2016
Last refreshed