Upper-middle income (World Bank) vs Zambia: Insufficiently active
Upper-middle income (World Bank)
83.87
in 2016
Zambia
89.27
in 2016
Upper-middle income (World Bank) rank
5th
Zambia rank
6th
Insufficiently active over time
- Upper-middle income (World Bank)
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 89.27 against 83.87 in Upper-middle income (World Bank), a difference of 5.4.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Upper-middle income (World Bank)'s.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Upper-middle income (World Bank) ranks 5th and Zambia ranks 6th of 11 groups.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Upper-middle income (World Bank) | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.59 | 88.68 | 4.09 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 84.06 | 89.11 | 5.05 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Upper-middle income (World Bank) or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 89.27 against 83.87 in Upper-middle income (World Bank) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Upper-middle income (World Bank) and Zambia?
- 5.4, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Upper-middle income (World Bank) and Zambia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Upper-middle income (World Bank) and Zambia rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Upper-middle income (World Bank) ranks 5th and Zambia ranks 6th of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.