Timor-Leste vs Zambia: Insufficiently active
Timor-Leste
89.37
in 2016
Zambia
89.27
in 2016
Timor-Leste rank
5th
Zambia rank
6th
Insufficiently active over time
- Timor-Leste
- Zambia
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 89.37 against 89.27 in Zambia, a difference of 0.1.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.
Timor-Leste ranks 5th and Zambia ranks 6th of 130 countries.
Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Timor-Leste | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.09 | 88.68 | 0.4155 | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 89.28 | 89.11 | 0.169 | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Timor-Leste or Zambia?
- Timor-Leste, at 89.37 against 89.27 in Zambia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Timor-Leste and Zambia?
- 0.1, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Timor-Leste and Zambia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Timor-Leste and Zambia rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Timor-Leste ranks 5th and Zambia ranks 6th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.