Timor-Leste vs Western Pacific (WHO region): Insufficiently active
Timor-Leste
89.37
in 2016
Western Pacific (WHO region)
85.78
in 2016
Timor-Leste rank
5th
Western Pacific (WHO region) rank
2nd
Insufficiently active over time
- Timor-Leste
- Western Pacific (WHO region)
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 89.37 against 85.78 in Western Pacific (WHO region), a difference of 3.59.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.
Timor-Leste ranks 5th and Western Pacific (WHO region) ranks 2nd of 132 countries.
Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Timor-Leste | Western Pacific (WHO region) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.09 | 85.97 | 3.13 | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 89.28 | 85.9 | 3.39 | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Timor-Leste or Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- Timor-Leste, at 89.37 against 85.78 in Western Pacific (WHO region) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Timor-Leste and Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- 3.59, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Timor-Leste and Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Timor-Leste and Western Pacific (WHO region) rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Timor-Leste ranks 5th and Western Pacific (WHO region) ranks 2nd of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.