Sudan vs Zambia: Insufficiently active
Sudan
90.3
in 2016
Zambia
89.27
in 2016
Sudan rank
4th
Zambia rank
6th
Insufficiently active over time
- Sudan
- Zambia
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 90.3 against 89.27 in Zambia, a difference of 1.03.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Sudan ranks 4th and Zambia ranks 6th of 130 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.57 | 88.68 | 0.8898 | Sudan |
| 2010s | 90.11 | 89.11 | 0.9943 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Sudan or Zambia?
- Sudan, at 90.3 against 89.27 in Zambia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Sudan and Zambia?
- 1.03, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zambia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Sudan and Zambia rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Sudan ranks 4th and Zambia ranks 6th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.