Sudan vs Western Pacific (WHO region): Insufficiently active
Sudan
90.3
in 2016
Western Pacific (WHO region)
85.78
in 2016
Sudan rank
4th
Western Pacific (WHO region) rank
2nd
Insufficiently active over time
- Sudan
- Western Pacific (WHO region)
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 90.3 against 85.78 in Western Pacific (WHO region), a difference of 4.52.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Western Pacific (WHO region)'s.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Sudan ranks 4th and Western Pacific (WHO region) ranks 2nd of 132 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Western Pacific (WHO region) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.57 | 85.97 | 3.6 | Sudan |
| 2010s | 90.11 | 85.9 | 4.21 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Sudan or Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- Sudan, at 90.3 against 85.78 in Western Pacific (WHO region) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Sudan and Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- 4.52, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Sudan and Western Pacific (WHO region) rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Sudan ranks 4th and Western Pacific (WHO region) ranks 2nd of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.