Sudan vs East Timor: Insufficiently active
Sudan
90.3
in 2016
East Timor
89.37
in 2016
Sudan rank
4th
East Timor rank
5th
Insufficiently active over time
- Sudan
- East Timor
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 90.3 against 89.37 in East Timor, a difference of 0.93.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Sudan ranks 4th and East Timor ranks 5th of 132 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.57 | 89.09 | 0.4743 | Sudan |
| 2010s | 90.11 | 89.28 | 0.8253 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Sudan or East Timor?
- Sudan, at 90.3 against 89.37 in East Timor as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Sudan and East Timor?
- 0.93, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and East Timor?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Sudan and East Timor rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Sudan ranks 4th and East Timor ranks 5th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.