Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Trinidad and Tobago: Insufficiently active
Saint Kitts and Nevis
82.28
in 2016
Trinidad and Tobago
82.15
in 2016
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
85th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
88th
Insufficiently active over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 82.28 against 82.15 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.13.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 85th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 88th of 132 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.02 | 82.89 | 0.1318 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 82.48 | 82.35 | 0.1323 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 82.28 against 82.15 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.13, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 85th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 88th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.