Sri Lanka vs Uganda: Insufficiently active
Sri Lanka
85.16
in 2016
Uganda
85.67
in 2016
Sri Lanka rank
46th
Uganda rank
43rd
Insufficiently active over time
- Sri Lanka
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 85.67 against 85.16 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.51.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 46th and Uganda ranks 43rd of 130 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.74 | 85.92 | 0.1855 | Uganda |
| 2010s | 85.31 | 85.74 | 0.431 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Sri Lanka or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 85.67 against 85.16 in Sri Lanka as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Sri Lanka and Uganda?
- 0.51, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Uganda?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Sri Lanka and Uganda rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Sri Lanka ranks 46th and Uganda ranks 43rd of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.