Philippines vs Western Pacific (WHO region): Insufficiently active
Philippines
93.41
in 2016
Western Pacific (WHO region)
85.78
in 2016
Philippines rank
2nd
Western Pacific (WHO region) rank
2nd
Insufficiently active over time
- Philippines
- Western Pacific (WHO region)
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 93.41 against 85.78 in Western Pacific (WHO region), a difference of 7.63.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Western Pacific (WHO region)'s.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 2nd and Western Pacific (WHO region) ranks 2nd of 132 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Western Pacific (WHO region) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.43 | 85.97 | 6.47 | Philippines |
| 2010s | 93.16 | 85.9 | 7.26 | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Philippines or Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- Philippines, at 93.41 against 85.78 in Western Pacific (WHO region) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Philippines and Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- 7.63, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Philippines and Western Pacific (WHO region) rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Philippines ranks 2nd and Western Pacific (WHO region) ranks 2nd of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.