New Zealand vs Zambia: Insufficiently active
New Zealand
88.74
in 2016
Zambia
89.27
in 2016
New Zealand rank
9th
Zambia rank
6th
Insufficiently active over time
- New Zealand
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 89.27 against 88.74 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.53.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 9th and Zambia ranks 6th of 132 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.61 | 88.68 | 1.07 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 88.44 | 89.11 | 0.676 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, New Zealand or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 89.27 against 88.74 in New Zealand as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between New Zealand and Zambia?
- 0.53, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Zambia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do New Zealand and Zambia rank globally for insufficiently active?
- New Zealand ranks 9th and Zambia ranks 6th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.