New Zealand vs South-East Asia (WHO region): Insufficiently active
New Zealand
88.74
in 2016
South-East Asia (WHO region)
75.59
in 2016
New Zealand rank
9th
South-East Asia (WHO region) rank
11th
Insufficiently active over time
- New Zealand
- South-East Asia (WHO region)
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 88.74 against 75.59 in South-East Asia (WHO region), a difference of 13.15.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times South-East Asia (WHO region)'s.
Across all 16 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 9th and South-East Asia (WHO region) ranks 11th of 132 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | South-East Asia (WHO region) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.61 | 77.41 | 10.2 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 88.44 | 76.09 | 12.35 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, New Zealand or South-East Asia (WHO region)?
- New Zealand, at 88.74 against 75.59 in South-East Asia (WHO region) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between New Zealand and South-East Asia (WHO region)?
- 13.15, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and South-East Asia (WHO region)?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do New Zealand and South-East Asia (WHO region) rank globally for insufficiently active?
- New Zealand ranks 9th and South-East Asia (WHO region) ranks 11th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.