Naoero, Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Insufficiently active
Naoero, Republic of
86.79
in 2016
Zimbabwe
86.64
in 2016
Naoero, Republic of rank
32nd
Zimbabwe rank
33rd
Insufficiently active over time
- Naoero, Republic of
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Naoero, Republic of currently reports 86.79 against 86.64 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.15.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Naoero, Republic of ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 130 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Naoero, Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Naoero, Republic of | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.68 | 86.78 | 0.1087 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 86.76 | 86.68 | 0.0852 | Naoero, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher insufficiently active, Naoero, Republic of or Zimbabwe?
- Naoero, Republic of, at 86.79 against 86.64 in Zimbabwe as of 2016.
- What is the difference in insufficiently active between Naoero, Republic of and Zimbabwe?
- 0.15, with Naoero, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero, Republic of and Zimbabwe?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Naoero, Republic of and Zimbabwe rank globally for insufficiently active?
- Naoero, Republic of ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Insufficiently active (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.